Jan 22 2010
People are morons
Having just read two articles in the Chicago Sun-Times demonstrating 1) How moronic people are in regards to how they treat children, and 2) How moronic todays children are, I want to pull my hair out.
Article one: A new study shows that kids do more remedial work than ever in their high school classes, are less apt to discuss politics, and sight “Make a lot of money” as their top priority when pickig what they want to do with their lives, and where to go to college.
Article 2: Some moron with a degree in child psychology has made it her mission to expose kids to Shakespeare. Not a moronic goal in and of itself, but the way she goes about it? Make Shakespeare short, and introduce them to the comedies first, basically implying the tragedies like Romeo and Juliet and Hamlet are too heavy and boring for kids in schoool.
There are so many things wrong here, I don’t know where to begin.
But I suppose I’ll begin with the big picture and move backwards: We have to stop appealing to the most selfish and lazy aspects of people and assume this is how they will learn and appreciate things. This simply isn’t true. How about, instead of putting on our condescending mommy voices, and cooing, “It’s not so hard! School, and learning, and making something of yourself and being enlightened is no harder than watching a reality tv show!”–instead of rewarding people for the most minimal of efforts, instead of making everything easier to understand….I don’t know, is it so crazy to say to kids, “Work harder, and you’ll get more out of your education”? Is that nutty? Apparently it is.
In regards to the first article: I’m baffled by the complete and utter lack of regard for the world around them these kids possess. Few political leanings or convictions, and money trumps raising a family, bettering the world, doing important work artistically, scientifically, socially, etc. These attitudes are not born in a vaccuum. When I was a kid, everyone wanted to be a vet or teacher. What the hell has happened?
I’ll tell you what’s happened: We’ve instilled the fear of poverty into today’s youth so much that to go through even a couple of years of strife in order to persue actual dreams seems catamount to suicide. I wonder if people even tell their kindergarteners to share their toys anymore, or if they encourage hording….
But the HILARIOUS thing is that while the focus is on making money and intellectual pursuits are dumbed down until they no longer resemble anything intellectual, there is also the most ridiculous of intellectual snobbery happening. A myth is being perpetuated: Trade school is for nobodies; Liberal arts study is for somebodies.
Is it just me, or is everything ass backwards around here? With this bizarre, hypocritical and selfish attitude, are we not telling our kids to be as useless as possible? “Don’t learn a trade, study liberal arts. And by study, I mean not in any sort of serious way, because intellectual/artistic/social/scientific persuits are for losers. As are trade schools.”
What? No wonder every person under 25 has a sense of entitlement and no brain or work ethic.
And the reason why is perfectly demonstrated in the second article about teaching kids Shakespeare.
Where to begin….where to begin. Well, first of all, I would like to acknowledge that the woman with the child psychology degree is not the first person to do this “abridged/get the kids laughing” approach. It’s done all of the time. So I’m not solely blaming her. Jesus, I WISH it were just her…
Okay, first of all: Nobody sees or reads Shakespeare because it’s easy. So to dumb it down will only make it (maybe) tolerable to the kids with no interest in it, but will not instill an interest to read further, and may squash any interest that kids who would otherwise like Shakespeare might have. It would be like handing a kid a Infinite Jest, condensed to 300 pages and all of the big words taken out and saying, “Do you appreciate David Foster Wallace now?” No. Because that wouldn’t even remotely be a David Foster Wallace novel. You would have removed all of the beauty from it–all of it’s appeal.
Secondly, to give the kids Shakespeare’s comedies is actually counter productive to making it “easy.” First of all, the comedies are not particularly “funny.” In honesty, I’d say they’re about as funny as the tragedies–which also feature comic relief. But some moron said, “Oh, these are comedies, they must be funny! Kids like funny!” Ugh. No. All comedy means is everyone gets married at the end, and not too many people die. Not to mention, in regards to the things that are funny in Shakespeare…many of the jokes require so much deciphering and historical context that yes, when examined, they are funny–but upon first glance, you’ll only really succeed in convincing kids that no, Shakespeare isn’t funny. Because you didn’t bother to teach them an appreciation of the language first. You’ve given them no reason to want to delve deeper and figure out the jokes. This is why high schools used to start with the tragedies. Because you don’t have to get some archaic joke on top of everything else. You can focus on the language. Which is another problem with overly abridging a Shakespeare play–NOW LISTEN TO ME TEACHERS: The appeal of Shakespeare is not his stories. The stories, for the most part, existed prior to Shakespeare. The appeal is what he did with them. The appeal is the language, and the very human way he told these stories. If you reduce Shakespeare to just the stories, and strip all of the other stuff out, it’s not terribly impressive. Nobody will give a shit about reading more Shakespeare–they will think they’re done. Sure, they’ll learn enough to pass your class, but no one will actually have learned anything.
But that’s the mantra these days: Do enough to get by, and at the end you’ll have a big freaking pile of money waiting for you.
But for anyone interested in teaching the younger generation something: Don’t assume they are morons from birth, because you made them that way by setting the bar as low as humanly possible. Remember, you can’t make everyone smart, but when you cater to the lowest common denominator, you can succeed in making everyone appallingly stupid.